 |
| ?Why Putin spoke of economic damage |
Since the fourth of October 2011 to today's Russia used its veto in the Security Council five times to protect Bashar al-Assad, last time I took a serious meaning to, first, because it confirmed adherence to proceed with the destruction of Aleppo and the Moscow dropped veto The Franco-Spanish, which calls for a halt to raids, and secondly because it is revealed that Vladimir Putin is sticking military solution from the outset, day sent troops to Syria, declaring that all shows Assad is a terrorist!
Sergey Lavrov exaggerates a lot when accuse America falling into the psychosis of fear of aggression from Russia, because the American threat to go to the alternatives of diplomacy in Syria, does not mean that cruise missiles will fall tomorrow on the Syrian regime, at least because the central decision in Washington completely cuffed and is now at the stage hibernate electoral month before the election on the eighth of next month!
Because Lavrov knows all this , it deliberately amplification, so that it appears in theend that the American threat just bubbles of words have no meaning, which is ofcourse what will negatively impact on America 's image and credibility of thedeclining foreign policy, especially with its allies the Gulf and in the Arab region.
Lavrov described the US position that he " is not a rhetorical obsession toward Russia but aggressive steps actually detrimental to our national interests and pose athreat to our security." But checking the backgrounds of US data since the collapse of a truce Aleppo and involvement of Russia and order in the destruction of themethodology of the city will make it in the end the process of Stalingrad age, can not find an obsession in both the US Alanchaiaat.
Lavrov described the US position that he " is not a rhetorical obsession toward Russia but aggressive steps actually detrimental to our national interests and pose athreat to our security." But checking the backgrounds of US data since the collapse of a truce Aleppo and involvement of Russia and order in the destruction of themethodology of the city will make it in the end the process of Stalingrad age, can not find an obsession in both the US Alanchaiaat.
Then I do not know where you found Lavrov those aggressive steps the US, that are harmful to the national interests of Russia and a threat to its security, especially at the end of his speech he says that he is convinced that Barack Obama would not agree to the military scenario! Does the word Lavrov made it to the Russian Information Agency, directed inwards to justify the continued escalation of the economic crisis is growing, especially since Putin issued last week a decree to suspend the agreement with the US to reduce the production of plutonium for military quantities that "until Washington stops economic sanctions and compensate mass Economist "?
"The Sunday Times" quotes a former adviser to the Kremlin Gleb Pavlovsky that demands Putin represents a signal to the weaknesses and try to throw all the blame on the United States in Russia's economic problems, and talk about the "economic devastation" confirms that America will not be dragged into military action in Syria, but they also engage Putin Assad in the destruction of the city of Aleppo and insisting on a military solution and fails French draft resolution for a cease-fire in the Security Council, could expand its sanctions fan, amid mounting features of a new cold war, Putin wants a cover to justify his difficulties economic!
0 comments:
Post a Comment