 |
| Obama |
Taking place in the corridors of the White House serious negotiations and rounds of marathon between officials of the US administration and the House Democrats who voted for the law of justice against the sponsors of terrorism known as "Justa", to reconsider the project Aleghanon, and try to find another way to avoid a collision between the US president and Congress management.
The law raises the state of anxiety among American officials from other states to enact similar laws to this law, which would open the way for any person in any country in the world to sue the government Alomirkah, in foreign courts.
As US President Barack Obama is seeking to wave a veto against the draft "Justa" passed by the Senate and House of Representatives Alomarkiyan and allows for the families of victims of the Sept. 11 attacks to sue states that the involvement of its nationals in terrorist operations inside the United States in US courts, Obama is trying to dissuade House Democrats to support law especially that some of them motivated by an electoral vote for it.
It is expected that Congress sends the bill to the White House on Saturday that given the White House approval or objection within 10 days of receipt of Alparwa, must send the president's response to the Senate first and will consider the Council technically in session, even though its members returned to their states to prepare for Antkhabat, and thus the Council will have the leaders to set a date to vote on the presidential veto.
Has not been determined after this date will likely not be voted experts until after the presidential election on 8 November.
But even in the event of the use of Obama's veto, Congress can skip the presidential veto and the issue of law if passed again, House and Senate by a majority of two-thirds.
Arab reactions condemning
This, following the reaction of Arab and international on the US Congress's decision to issue legislation under the name of "justice law against sponsors of terrorism", after the Muslim World League and the Organization of Muslim Scholars, the statement concerned the position as a result of this legislation, "clear and frank with the UN Charter and the principles of international law for violating began Arab reactions condemning the legislation.
Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) expressed deep concern for the issuance of the US Congress on behalf of legislation (justice law against sponsors of terrorism), which violates the established principles of international law, especially the principle of the sovereign equality of States enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations.
The UAE also expressed serious concern over the adoption of the US Congress known as justice law against sponsors of terrorism, and said Sheikh Abdullah Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of the UAE that this law is contrary to general liability rules and the principle of sovereignty enjoyed by the states.
As said the Jordanian official news agency (Petra) that "the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan expressed concern for the consequences of justice law against sponsors of terrorism, which was approved by the US Congress recently, what may result in negative repercussions on international cooperation in the fight against terrorism at this stage that require higher coordination and joint action levels. "
The agency quoted Minister of State for Media Affairs government spokesman Mohammed Al-Momani that "this legislation would conflict with the principles of equal sovereignty of states and the text of the Charter of the United Nations."
"The Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan hopes that the US Congress to reconsider the law."
In addition, the description of Morocco Tuesday the US congressional approval of a bill "Justice against the sponsors of terrorism", as "the targeting and discrediting countries friendly to the US," explaining that this law could "undermine international efforts, including the US, in the fight against terrorism ".
Muslim World League and the World Organization for Muslim Scholars, the same Association also expressed its deep concern for the issuance of the US Congress such a law, for violating clearly and explicitly, the UN Charter and the principles of international law, as contrary to the foundations of international relations based on the principles of sovereign equality, and immunity of State , mutual respect, and not to impose domestic laws of any State to the other country, according to her statement.
0 comments:
Post a Comment